cdr: be higher in developed countries

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amino acid
Weight: 0.48
, tool
Weight: 0.41
, sequence
Weight: 0.38
, part
Weight: 0.37
Siblings threonine
Weight: 0.31
, alanine
Weight: 0.31
, ascorbic acid
Weight: 0.31
, isoleucine
Weight: 0.31
, asparagine
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher in developed countries 1.00
be higher in countries 0.94
is developed region 0.82
is most developed region 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cdr, be higher in developed countries)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cdr, be higher in countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cdr, is developed region)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cdr, be higher in countries)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cdr, is most developed region)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cdr, is most developed region)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cdr, be higher in countries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cdr, is most developed region)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cdr, is most developed region)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cdr, is developed region)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cdr, be higher in countries)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cdr, is developed region)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cdr, is developed region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cdr, be higher in developed countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(cdr, be higher in developed countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cdr, be higher in developed countries)