ceiling: be painted flat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents limit
Weight: 0.60
, wall
Weight: 0.58
, floor
Weight: 0.57
, surface
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings soffit
Weight: 0.49
, ground floor
Weight: 0.35
, top floor
Weight: 0.34
, second floor
Weight: 0.34
, balcony
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be painted flat 1.00
be painted flat white 0.97
be painted white 0.88
be painted blue 0.88
contain iron painted 0.78
bubble after painting 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wall, be painted white)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ceiling, be painted flat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wall, be painted white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wall, be painted white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(wall, be painted white)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ceiling, be painted flat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(ceiling, be painted flat)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ceiling, be painted flat white)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ceiling, be painted blue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(ceiling, be painted flat white)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ceiling, be painted white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ceiling, be painted blue)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ceiling, be painted flat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ceiling, be painted flat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wall, be painted white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ceiling, be painted flat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wall, be painted white)