ceiling: is paint flaking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents limit
Weight: 0.60
, wall
Weight: 0.58
, floor
Weight: 0.57
, surface
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings soffit
Weight: 0.49
, ground floor
Weight: 0.35
, top floor
Weight: 0.34
, second floor
Weight: 0.34
, balcony
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paint flaking 1.00
is paint peeling 0.87
is paint bubbling 0.78
crack plaster 0.76
be covered in soot in interior 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wall, crack plaster)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ceiling, is paint flaking)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ceiling, is paint flaking)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wall, crack plaster)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ceiling, is paint flaking)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(wall, crack plaster)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(wall, crack plaster)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(ceiling, is paint flaking)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ceiling, is paint flaking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ceiling, is paint flaking)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ceiling, is paint flaking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(ceiling, is paint flaking)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ceiling, is paint flaking)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ceiling, is paint flaking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(ceiling, is paint flaking)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ceiling, is paint flaking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ceiling, is paint flaking)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(wall, crack plaster)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ceiling, is paint flaking)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(wall, crack plaster)