celebrity: deal with huge number of replies on twitter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.58
Siblings movie star
Weight: 0.73
, stephen hawking
Weight: 0.68
, bob hope
Weight: 0.67
, bob dylan
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
deal with huge number of replies on twitter 1.00
use twitter 0.84
follow on twitter 0.83
tweet 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(celebrity, use twitter)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(celebrity, use twitter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(celebrity, follow on twitter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(celebrity, follow on twitter)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(celebrity, tweet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, use twitter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, follow on twitter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(celebrity, use twitter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(celebrity, tweet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(celebrity, follow on twitter)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(celebrity, tweet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, tweet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(celebrity, deal with huge number of replies on twitter)