cell phone: be good for emergencies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents telephone line
Weight: 0.76
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.75
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.70
, phone
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.69
, android
Weight: 0.64
, cellphone
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for emergencies 1.00
be used in emergencies 0.98
be helpful in emergencies 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cell phone, be good for emergencies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cell phone, be good for emergencies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(phone, be good for emergencies)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be good for emergencies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be good for emergencies)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(phone, be good for emergencies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be good for emergencies)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be good for emergencies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cell phone, be good for emergencies)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cell phone, be used in emergencies)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cell phone, be used in emergencies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be used in emergencies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(cell phone, be helpful in emergencies)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cell phone, be helpful in emergencies)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be helpful in emergencies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be helpful in emergencies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be used in emergencies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be good for emergencies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cell phone, be good for emergencies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(phone, be good for emergencies)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be good for emergencies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(phone, be good for emergencies)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(cell phone, be good for emergencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be good for emergencies)