cell wall: has physical part membranes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell membrane
Weight: 0.69
, cell
Weight: 0.68
, wall
Weight: 0.68
, organelle
Weight: 0.66
Siblings red blood cell
Weight: 0.40
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.39
, sperm cell
Weight: 0.39
, stem cell
Weight: 0.38
, bone cell
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part membranes 1.00
have semipermeable membranes 0.94
has physical part organelles 0.81
be in xylem cells 0.79
has physical part organelle 0.79
be important to bacterial cells 0.79
be important to cells 0.78
protect cells from osmotic pressure 0.77
be formed in cells 0.76
be important for plant cells 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(organelle, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cell, has physical part organelles)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(organelle, has physical part membranes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cell, has physical part organelles)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(organelle, has physical part membranes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cell, has physical part organelles)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(organelle, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cell, has physical part organelles)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, have semipermeable membranes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part organelles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be in xylem cells)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part organelle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be important to bacterial cells)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be important to cells)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, protect cells from osmotic pressure)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be important for plant cells)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, be formed in cells)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cell wall, be formed in cells)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(cell wall, have semipermeable membranes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cell wall, has physical part organelles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cell wall, has physical part organelle)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be formed in cells)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(cell wall, has physical part organelles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cell wall, has physical part organelles)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cell wall, has physical part organelle)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cell wall, have semipermeable membranes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cell wall, has physical part organelle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cell wall, be formed in cells)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cell wall, be in xylem cells)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cell wall, have semipermeable membranes)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cell wall, be important to bacterial cells)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(cell wall, protect cells from osmotic pressure)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cell wall, be important to cells)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cell wall, be important for plant cells)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be in xylem cells)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cell wall, protect cells from osmotic pressure)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be important to cells)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be important to bacterial cells)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cell wall, be in xylem cells)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cell wall, be important for plant cells)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(cell wall, be important to cells)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cell wall, protect cells from osmotic pressure)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cell wall, be important to bacterial cells)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cell wall, be important for plant cells)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(organelle, has physical part membranes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cell, has physical part organelles)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(organelle, has physical part membranes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cell wall, has physical part membranes)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cell, has physical part organelles)