cellar: has state damp

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.67
, room
Weight: 0.65
, cold storage
Weight: 0.54
, building
Weight: 0.53
Siblings wine cellar
Weight: 0.38
, basement
Weight: 0.36
, laundry room
Weight: 0.35
, hotel room
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state damp 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(room, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cellar, has state damp)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(room, has state damp)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(room, has state damp)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, has state damp)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(basement, has state damp)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(room, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cellar, has state damp)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(basement, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(basement, has state damp)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(hotel room, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hotel room, has state damp)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(cellar, has state damp)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cellar, has state damp)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cellar, has state damp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(room, has state damp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hotel room, has state damp)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(basement, has state damp)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(cellar, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(room, has state damp)