cellphone: use computers technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.71
, device
Weight: 0.65
, cell phone
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings cellular telephone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.38
, mobile
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
use computers technology 1.00
be called cellphones 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(device, be called cellphones)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cellphone, use computers technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(device, be called cellphones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(device, be called cellphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(device, be called cellphones)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cellphone, use computers technology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cellphone, use computers technology)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, be called cellphones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cellphone, be called cellphones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cellphone, be called cellphones)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cellphone, be called cellphones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, use computers technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cellphone, use computers technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(device, be called cellphones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(cellphone, use computers technology)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(device, be called cellphones)