cellulose: be bad for humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.67
, macromolecule
Weight: 0.64
, compound
Weight: 0.62
, molecule
Weight: 0.61
, filler
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ethylene oxide
Weight: 0.37
, polyethylene
Weight: 0.36
, lignin
Weight: 0.36
, resin
Weight: 0.36
, rna molecule
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for humans 1.00
be important for humans 0.93
be in humans 0.93
be important to humans 0.91
digest in humans 0.79
be important to animals 0.78
be important to human digestion 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(macromolecule, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(macromolecule, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(macromolecule, be important to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(macromolecule, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cellulose, be bad for humans)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cellulose, be in humans)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be in humans)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cellulose, be in humans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(cellulose, be important for humans)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cellulose, be important to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cellulose, digest in humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cellulose, be important for humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be important for humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cellulose, be important to humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be important for humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be important to humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cellulose, digest in humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be important to humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cellulose, digest in humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cellulose, be important to animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cellulose, be important to human digestion)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be in humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be important to animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be important to animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be important to human digestion)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cellulose, be important to animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cellulose, be important to human digestion)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(cellulose, be important to human digestion)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, digest in humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(macromolecule, be important to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(cellulose, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(macromolecule, be important to humans)