central park: is capitalized

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.89
, attraction
Weight: 0.72
, location
Weight: 0.71
, landmark
Weight: 0.70
, center
Weight: 0.69
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.42
, national park
Weight: 0.41
, national parks
Weight: 0.39
, amusement park
Weight: 0.38
, city
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is capitalized 1.00
have capitalized 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(park, have capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(central park, is capitalized)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(park, have capitalized)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(park, have capitalized)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(park, have capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, is capitalized)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(central park, is capitalized)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(central park, have capitalized)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(central park, have capitalized)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(central park, have capitalized)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(central park, have capitalized)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(central park, is capitalized)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(central park, is capitalized)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(park, have capitalized)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(central park, is capitalized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(park, have capitalized)