ceramic: be stronger in compression

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger in compression 1.00
be stronger than compression 0.99
have high compressive strength 0.78
have compressive strength 0.77
be stronger than tension 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ceramic, be stronger in compression)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger than compression)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ceramic, be stronger than compression)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be stronger than tension)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger than tension)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ceramic, be stronger than compression)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(ceramic, be stronger than tension)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(ceramic, have compressive strength)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be stronger than compression)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(ceramic, have high compressive strength)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ceramic, have compressive strength)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ceramic, be stronger than tension)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ceramic, have compressive strength)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ceramic, have high compressive strength)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(ceramic, have high compressive strength)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have compressive strength)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have high compressive strength)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger in compression)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in compression)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ceramic, be stronger in compression)