ceramic: be stronger in tension

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger in tension 1.00
be stronger than tension 0.99
be weaker in tension 0.95
be stronger than compression 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(ceramic, be stronger in tension)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger than tension)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be stronger than tension)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(ceramic, be stronger than tension)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be weaker in tension)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be weaker in tension)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(ceramic, be weaker in tension)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ceramic, be stronger than tension)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ceramic, be weaker in tension)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger than compression)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(ceramic, be stronger than compression)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ceramic, be stronger than compression)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be stronger than compression)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be stronger in tension)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ceramic, be stronger in tension)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ceramic, be stronger in tension)