ceramic: be used in electronics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in electronics 1.00
be used in computers 0.79
be used in clothing 0.75
be used in practical appliances 0.75
be used in jewelry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(alloy, be used in practical appliances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used in electronics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alloy, be used in jewelry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used in electronics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(alloy, be used in jewelry)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(alloy, be used in practical appliances)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(alloy, be used in practical appliances)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(alloy, be used in jewelry)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be used in clothing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(alloy, be used in practical appliances) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used in electronics)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(alloy, be used in jewelry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used in electronics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(acrylic, be used in clothing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be used in clothing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used in electronics)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ceramic, be used in computers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(ceramic, be used in computers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used in computers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used in computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ceramic, be used in electronics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(alloy, be used in jewelry)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(alloy, be used in practical appliances)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(acrylic, be used in clothing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(alloy, be used in jewelry)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(ceramic, be used in electronics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(alloy, be used in practical appliances)