ceramic: have density

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have density 1.00
have low density 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(polymer, have low density)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ceramic, have density)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(polymer, have low density)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(polymer, have low density)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(polymer, have low density)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ceramic, have density)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(ceramic, have density)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have low density)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ceramic, have low density)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ceramic, have low density)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ceramic, have low density)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have density)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ceramic, have density)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(polymer, have low density)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(ceramic, have density)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(polymer, have low density)