ceramic: have high melting points

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents medium
Weight: 0.59
, alloy
Weight: 0.59
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, polymer
Weight: 0.58
Siblings silicon carbide
Weight: 0.73
, resin
Weight: 0.35
, acrylic
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.35
, pottery
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high melting points 1.00
have melting points 0.97
have high melting point 0.95
have melting point 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(ceramic, have high melting points)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(ceramic, have high melting point)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(ceramic, have high melting point)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have high melting point)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(ceramic, have melting point)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(ceramic, have melting point)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have melting point)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ceramic, have high melting point)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ceramic, have melting point)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, have high melting points)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ceramic, have high melting points)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(ceramic, have high melting points)