cereal: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents starch
Weight: 0.69
, dairy product
Weight: 0.67
, grain
Weight: 0.64
, carbohydrate
Weight: 0.63
, staple
Weight: 0.62
Siblings wheat flour
Weight: 0.73
, wheat germ
Weight: 0.68
, barley
Weight: 0.67
, lentil
Weight: 0.64
, millet
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
be important to things 0.81
go bad 0.80
has quality good 0.80
be good for health 0.78
be important for life 0.78
be good at night 0.77
was important to people 0.77
was important to people in times 0.77
do 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dairy product, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cereal, be good for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(starch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cereal, be good for us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(grain, was important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cereal, be good for us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carbohydrate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cereal, be good for us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(grain, was important to people in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cereal, be good for us)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cereal, be good for us)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(starch, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cereal, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be good for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(starch, do)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(grain, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(carbohydrate, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(starch, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(grain, was important to people in times)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(grain, was important to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be good for us)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(starch, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grain, was important to people)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grain, was important to people in times)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(grain, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(starch, do)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(carbohydrate, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(wheat flour, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lentil, be good for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dairy product, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cereal, be good for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(starch, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cereal, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(carbohydrate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cereal, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(grain, was important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cereal, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(grain, was important to people in times) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cereal, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(grain, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cereal, be good for us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(starch, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cereal, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(lentil, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(lentil, be good for us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(wheat flour, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wheat flour, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cereal, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cereal, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cereal, be good at night)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cereal, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cereal, be good at night)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cereal, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good at night)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cereal, be good at night)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cereal, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cereal, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(starch, do)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grain, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dairy product, be good for us)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(carbohydrate, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grain, was important to people in times)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(grain, was important to people)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(starch, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(wheat flour, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lentil, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dairy product, be good for us)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(starch, do)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grain, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(carbohydrate, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(starch, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grain, was important to people in times)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cereal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(grain, was important to people)