chad: has physical part flags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
Siblings arkansas
Weight: 0.32
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.32
, delaware
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part flags 1.00
has physical part flag 0.95
be 's flags 0.94
have same flag 0.88
use flag 0.87
have identical flags 0.86
use same flag 0.86
have nearly identical flags 0.85
have flag as romania 0.82
have same flag as romania 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(country, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(chad, has physical part flags)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(state, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(chad, has physical part flags)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(state, has physical part flags)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(country, has physical part flags)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(country, has physical part flags)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(state, has physical part flags)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(country, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(chad, has physical part flags)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(state, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(chad, has physical part flags)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(chad, has physical part flags)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chad, be 's flags)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(chad, be 's flags)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chad, use flag)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chad, use flag)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(chad, be 's flags)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chad, be 's flags)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(chad, use flag)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(chad, use same flag)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(chad, have identical flags)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(chad, have identical flags)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(chad, have identical flags)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(chad, have flag as romania)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chad, use same flag)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(chad, have flag as romania)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chad, have flag as romania)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(chad, use same flag)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(chad, have nearly identical flags)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chad, have flag as romania)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chad, have nearly identical flags)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chad, use flag)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(chad, have nearly identical flags)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chad, have identical flags)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(chad, have same flag)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(chad, have same flag)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(chad, have nearly identical flags)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chad, have same flag)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(chad, have same flag as romania)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chad, use same flag)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chad, have same flag)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chad, have same flag as romania)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(chad, have same flag as romania)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chad, have same flag as romania)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(chad, has physical part flags)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(state, has physical part flags)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(country, has physical part flags)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(state, has physical part flags)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(chad, has physical part flags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(country, has physical part flags)