chad: is bad name

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
Siblings arkansas
Weight: 0.32
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.32
, delaware
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad name 1.00
has state name 0.87
is douche name 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chad, is bad name)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(country, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(country, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(country, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(chad, is bad name)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(chad, is bad name)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chad, is douche name)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(chad, is douche name)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(chad, is douche name)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chad, is douche name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chad, is bad name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(chad, is bad name)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(chad, is bad name) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(country, has quality bad)