chad: suck

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
Siblings arkansas
Weight: 0.32
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.32
, delaware
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
suck 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chad, suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, suck)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chad, suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(milwaukee, suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(milwaukee, suck)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chad, suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chad, suck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(chad, suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chad, suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chad, suck)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(chad, suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(chad, suck)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chad, suck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(milwaukee, suck)