chalk: is good aquifer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, item
Weight: 0.52
, medium
Weight: 0.51
, drawing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings crayon
Weight: 0.32
, glue stick
Weight: 0.32
, paper towel
Weight: 0.32
, sand
Weight: 0.32
, nail polish
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good aquifer 1.00
be in water 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sand, be in water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(sand, be in water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sand, be in water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(chalk, is good aquifer)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chalk, be in water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chalk, be in water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(chalk, be in water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chalk, be in water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chalk, is good aquifer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chalk, is good aquifer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chalk, is good aquifer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sand, be in water)