challenge: be at work

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.65
, opportunity
Weight: 0.65
, step
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.62
Siblings motivation
Weight: 0.69
, question
Weight: 0.66
, stigma
Weight: 0.65
, new job
Weight: 0.65
, pressure
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at work 1.00
wants to go to work 0.87
slow work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(problem, slow work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(challenge, be at work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(problem, slow work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(problem, slow work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(new job, wants to go to work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(problem, slow work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(challenge, be at work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(new job, wants to go to work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(new job, wants to go to work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(challenge, be at work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be at work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(challenge, be at work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(problem, slow work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(new job, wants to go to work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(challenge, be at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(problem, slow work)