champagne: is brut

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.74
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.64
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.62
, bottle
Weight: 0.58
, drink
Weight: 0.57
Siblings glass bottle
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, red wine
Weight: 0.36
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is brut 1.00
be called brut 0.99
be called vino tinto 0.77
be more expensive than prosecco 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be called vino tinto)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red wine, be called vino tinto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(red wine, be called vino tinto)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(champagne, is brut)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(champagne, be called brut)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(champagne, be called brut)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be called brut)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(champagne, be called brut)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(champagne, be more expensive than prosecco)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is brut)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(champagne, is brut)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(champagne, is brut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(red wine, be called vino tinto)