chanel: be more expensive than lv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.65
, shop
Weight: 0.58
, name
Weight: 0.58
, label
Weight: 0.57
, handbag
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hermes
Weight: 0.36
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.35
, burberry
Weight: 0.35
, volvo
Weight: 0.34
, audi
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than lv 1.00
be cheaper in paris 0.78
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(label, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(handbag, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(handbag, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(label, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(label, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(handbag, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(audi, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(burberry, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hermes, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(volvo, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(label, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(handbag, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(volvo, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(volvo, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hermes, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hermes, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(burberry, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(burberry, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(audi, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(audi, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(chanel, be more expensive than lv)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chanel, be cheaper in paris)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(chanel, be cheaper in paris)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be cheaper in paris)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chanel, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(chanel, be cheaper in paris)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chanel, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chanel, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(chanel, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(handbag, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(label, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(volvo, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hermes, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(burberry, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(audi, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(handbag, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(chanel, be more expensive than lv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(label, is expensive)