change: be in interest rate effect investment demand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.64
, step
Weight: 0.62
, revision
Weight: 0.61
, intervention
Weight: 0.60
Siblings departure
Weight: 0.67
, transformation
Weight: 0.66
, correction
Weight: 0.64
, evolution
Weight: 0.63
, deletion
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in interest rate effect investment demand 1.00
be in interest rates 0.89
be in price 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(move, be in price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(move, be in price)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(move, be in price)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(move, be in price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(change, be in interest rates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(change, be in interest rates)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(change, be in interest rates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(change, be in interest rates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(move, be in price)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(change, be in interest rate effect investment demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(move, be in price)