character: be at play in play

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guy
Weight: 0.64
, characteristic
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.60
Siblings villain
Weight: 0.70
, superman
Weight: 0.69
, clown
Weight: 0.68
, superhero
Weight: 0.68
, elf
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at play in play 1.00
be a part of play 0.93
be at play in program 0.85
be at play in theater 0.84
be at play in script 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(act, be a part of play)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(character, be at play in play)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(act, be a part of play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(act, be a part of play)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(act, be a part of play)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(character, be at play in play)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(character, be at play in play)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(character, be at play in program)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(character, be at play in theater)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(character, be at play in theater)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(character, be at play in theater)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(character, be at play in program)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(character, be at play in program)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(character, be at play in script)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(character, be at play in script)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(character, be at play in theater)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(character, be at play in program)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(character, be at play in script)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(character, be at play in script)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(character, be at play in play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(character, be at play in play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(act, be a part of play)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(character, be at play in play)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(act, be a part of play)