charcoal: be good for teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents color
Weight: 0.68
, material
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, fuel
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hair color
Weight: 0.35
, violet
Weight: 0.35
, paraffin
Weight: 0.35
, graphite
Weight: 0.35
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for teeth 1.00
be good for skin 0.82
make teeth whiter 0.78
be good for dogs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(paraffin, be good for skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(paraffin, be good for skin)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(paraffin, be good for skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(charcoal, be good for teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(charcoal, be good for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(charcoal, be good for dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(charcoal, be good for dogs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(charcoal, be good for skin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(charcoal, be good for skin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(charcoal, be good for skin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(charcoal, be good for dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(charcoal, be good for skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(charcoal, be good for teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(charcoal, be good for teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(charcoal, be good for teeth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(paraffin, be good for skin)