charles: was drew famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.59
, king
Weight: 0.59
, man
Weight: 0.57
, guy
Weight: 0.56
, writer
Weight: 0.55
Siblings charles darwin
Weight: 0.36
, louis armstrong
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was drew famous 1.00
be drew famous 0.99
was famous for 0.83
was makintosh famous for 0.83
was makintosh famous 0.82
was famous upham 0.82
was famous 0.82
was gualle famous 0.82
was famous parnell 0.82
is famous 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(louis armstrong, is famous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(charles darwin, is famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(charles darwin, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(charles darwin, is famous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(louis armstrong, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(louis armstrong, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(charles, was drew famous)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(charles, was makintosh famous for)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(charles, was famous upham)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(charles, was makintosh famous for)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(charles, was famous upham)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(charles, was makintosh famous for)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(charles, was drew famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(charles, was drew famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(charles darwin, is famous)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(charles, was drew famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(louis armstrong, is famous)