chart: analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graph
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.62
, course
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.61
Siblings average
Weight: 0.33
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.31
, volume
Weight: 0.31
, tutorial
Weight: 0.31
, study
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
analysis 1.00
be used in analysis 0.96
evaluation 0.79
analyze data 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(course, evaluation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chart, analysis)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(course, evaluation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, evaluation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(course, evaluation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(chart, analysis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(chart, analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chart, be used in analysis)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chart, be used in analysis)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(chart, be used in analysis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(chart, analyze data)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(chart, analyze data)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chart, analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chart, analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(course, evaluation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(chart, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(course, evaluation)