chase: be good company work for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bank
Weight: 0.59
, man
Weight: 0.55
, corporation
Weight: 0.55
, game
Weight: 0.54
, film
Weight: 0.54
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.33
, hunt
Weight: 0.32
, old man
Weight: 0.32
, football game
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good company work for 1.00
be good company work 0.99
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chase, be good company work for)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bank, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chase, be good company work for)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chase, be good company work for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bank, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(football game, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chase, be good company work for)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bank, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chase, be good company work for)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(chase, be good company work for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(football game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(football game, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(chase, be good company work for)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(chase, be good company work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chase, be good company work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chase, be good company work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chase, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chase, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(chase, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(chase, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chase, be good company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(football game, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(chase, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)