chat room: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents forum
Weight: 0.69
, web site
Weight: 0.67
, chat
Weight: 0.64
, topic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings irc
Weight: 0.60
, icq
Weight: 0.44
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34
, twitter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
be dangerous 0.99
is unsafe 0.80
is scary 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(web, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(web, is scary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(web, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(web, is dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(twitter, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(twitter, be dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(web, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web, is scary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(chat room, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(chat room, is unsafe)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(chat room, is unsafe)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chat room, is unsafe)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(chat room, is unsafe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chat room, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chat room, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(web, is dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(twitter, be dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chat room, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(web, is scary)