chat: be unavailable on league

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chat room
Weight: 0.64
, conversation
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.34
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.33
, tweet
Weight: 0.32
, preview
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be unavailable on league 1.00
be unavailable on pro league 0.94
is unavailable 0.90
be unavailable in mode 0.83
be currently unavailable on facebook 0.81
be unavailable in spectate mode 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tweet, is unavailable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(tweet, is unavailable)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(tweet, is unavailable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(chat, be unavailable on league)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(chat, is unavailable)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(chat, is unavailable)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chat, be unavailable on pro league)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(chat, is unavailable)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(chat, is unavailable)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chat, be unavailable on league)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chat, be unavailable on league)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chat, be unavailable on league)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tweet, is unavailable)