chat: be with friends

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chat room
Weight: 0.64
, conversation
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.34
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.33
, tweet
Weight: 0.32
, preview
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with friends 1.00
call fake friend 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(conversation, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chat, be with friends)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(conversation, be with friends)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be with friends)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(conversation, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chat, be with friends)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(chat, be with friends)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chat, call fake friend)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chat, call fake friend)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chat, call fake friend)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chat, call fake friend)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chat, be with friends)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chat, be with friends)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(conversation, be with friends)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chat, be with friends) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(conversation, be with friends)