chat: is awful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chat room
Weight: 0.64
, conversation
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.34
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.33
, tweet
Weight: 0.32
, preview
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is awful 1.00
stink bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chat, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(chat, is awful)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(chat, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(chat, stink bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(chat, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(chat, stink bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chat, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(chat, stink bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(chat, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chat, stink bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(chat, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chat, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(chat, is awful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(chat, is awful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chat, is awful)