chat: spamming f for ebt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chat room
Weight: 0.64
, conversation
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings talk
Weight: 0.34
, talk show
Weight: 0.33
, talking
Weight: 0.33
, tweet
Weight: 0.32
, preview
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
spamming f for ebt 1.00
spamming leave wtf \ 0.88
spam gg 0.85
spamming trihard incorporated 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(chat, spamming f for ebt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(chat, spamming f for ebt)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(chat, spamming f for ebt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(chat, spamming leave wtf \)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(chat, spamming f for ebt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(chat, spam gg)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(chat, spamming f for ebt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chat, spamming trihard incorporated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(chat, spamming f for ebt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(chat, spamming leave wtf \)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(chat, spamming f for ebt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(chat, spamming leave wtf \)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(chat, spamming f for ebt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chat, spamming f for ebt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(chat, spamming f for ebt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(chat, spamming f for ebt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chat, spamming f for ebt)