cheating: is deal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.57
, action
Weight: 0.56
, sin
Weight: 0.55
Siblings infidelity
Weight: 0.34
, adultery
Weight: 0.33
, bullying
Weight: 0.33
, cheater
Weight: 0.33
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is deal 1.00
is big deal 0.92
is deal really 0.90
be big deal to people 0.88
is big deal really 0.85
be big deal to many people 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sin, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cheating, is deal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(sin, is big deal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sin, is big deal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(sin, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cheating, is deal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cheating, is deal)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is big deal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(cheating, is big deal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cheating, is big deal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is big deal really)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(cheating, is big deal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cheating, is big deal really)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cheating, is big deal really)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cheating, is big deal really)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is deal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cheating, is deal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sin, is big deal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cheating, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sin, is big deal)