check: be in desktop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents account
Weight: 0.63
, application
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cash register
Weight: 0.33
, log
Weight: 0.33
, pocket watch
Weight: 0.33
, business card
Weight: 0.33
, debit card
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in desktop 1.00
look like server 0.80
have software 0.78
look like private server 0.77
have important software 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(application, have important software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(check, be in desktop)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(application, have software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(check, be in desktop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(application, have software)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(application, have important software)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(application, have important software)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(application, have software)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(application, have important software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(check, be in desktop)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(application, have software) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(check, be in desktop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(check, be in desktop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(check, be in desktop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(check, be in desktop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(application, have software)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(application, have important software)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(application, have software)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(check, be in desktop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(application, have important software)