check: be in in 3

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents account
Weight: 0.63
, application
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cash register
Weight: 0.33
, log
Weight: 0.33
, pocket watch
Weight: 0.33
, business card
Weight: 0.33
, debit card
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in in 3 1.00
even get for 4 * 0.85
is 1 zero 0.83
take over 4 days 0.83
take over 4 days to process 0.78
in 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(application, take over 4 days)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(check, be in in 3)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(application, take over 4 days to process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(check, be in in 3)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(account, even get for 4 *)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(check, be in in 3)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(account, even get for 4 *)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(application, take over 4 days)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(application, take over 4 days to process)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(application, take over 4 days)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(application, take over 4 days to process)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(account, even get for 4 *)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(log, is 1 zero)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(log, in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(application, take over 4 days)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(check, be in in 3)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(application, take over 4 days to process)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(check, be in in 3)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(account, even get for 4 *)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(check, be in in 3)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(log, in)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(log, in)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(log, is 1 zero)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(log, is 1 zero)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(check, be in in 3)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(check, be in in 3)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(account, even get for 4 *)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(application, take over 4 days)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(application, take over 4 days to process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(log, in)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(log, is 1 zero)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(account, even get for 4 *)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(application, take over 4 days)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(check, be in in 3)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(application, take over 4 days to process)