check: get declined

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents account
Weight: 0.63
, application
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cash register
Weight: 0.33
, log
Weight: 0.33
, pocket watch
Weight: 0.33
, business card
Weight: 0.33
, debit card
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get declined 1.00
is declined 0.99
is is declined 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(debit card, is declined)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(debit card, get declined)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(debit card, is is declined)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(debit card, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(debit card, get declined)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(debit card, is declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(debit card, is declined)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(debit card, is is declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(debit card, is is declined)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(check, get declined)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(check, get declined)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(check, get declined)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(debit card, get declined)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(debit card, is declined)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(check, get declined) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(debit card, is is declined)