check: limits powers of national executive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents account
Weight: 0.63
, application
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cash register
Weight: 0.33
, log
Weight: 0.33
, pocket watch
Weight: 0.33
, business card
Weight: 0.33
, debit card
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
limits powers of national executive 1.00
limits powers of executive 0.98
limits powers 0.90
have limits 0.80
limit abuse of power 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(debit card, have limits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(debit card, have limits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(debit card, have limits)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(check, limits powers of national executive)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(check, limit abuse of power)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(check, limit abuse of power)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(check, limit abuse of power)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(check, limit abuse of power)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(check, limits powers of national executive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(check, limits powers of national executive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(check, limits powers of national executive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(debit card, have limits)