checkers: have names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.64
, game
Weight: 0.61
, event
Weight: 0.49
, sport
Weight: 0.47
, tool
Weight: 0.47
Siblings chess game
Weight: 0.34
, backgammon
Weight: 0.33
, crossword puzzle
Weight: 0.33
, hockey game
Weight: 0.32
, solitaire
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have names 1.00
have different names 0.95
have two names 0.94
have 2 names 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(checkers, have names)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(checkers, have two names)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(checkers, have different names)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(checkers, have different names)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(checkers, have two names)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(checkers, have 2 names)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(checkers, have 2 names)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(checkers, have two names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(checkers, have different names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(checkers, have 2 names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(checkers, have different names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(checkers, have two names)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(checkers, have 2 names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(checkers, have names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(checkers, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(checkers, have names)