cheddar: be in tamarac

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cheese
Weight: 0.70
, dish
Weight: 0.57
, dairy product
Weight: 0.55
, flavor
Weight: 0.50
, standard
Weight: 0.49
Siblings cream cheese
Weight: 0.38
, swiss cheese
Weight: 0.37
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.35
, cottage cheese
Weight: 0.35
, potato salad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in tamarac 1.00
have 0.77
have univision 0.77
be bad after all 0.76
were affected during world war 2 0.75
be used in tpn 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(dairy product, be used in tpn)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(dish, have univision)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(standard, were affected during world war 2)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(standard, be bad after all)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(standard, be bad after all)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(standard, were affected during world war 2)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(dish, have univision)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be used in tpn)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dish, have univision)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(standard, be bad after all)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(standard, were affected during world war 2)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be used in tpn)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(dish, have univision)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(standard, be bad after all)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(dairy product, be used in tpn)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(standard, were affected during world war 2)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(cheddar, be in tamarac)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dish, have univision)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(standard, be bad after all)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(standard, were affected during world war 2)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dairy product, be used in tpn)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(standard, be bad after all)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(standard, were affected during world war 2)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dish, have univision)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(cheddar, be in tamarac)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dairy product, be used in tpn)