cheetah: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.72
, predator
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.66
, leopard
Weight: 0.66
Siblings rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tortoise
Weight: 0.38
, zebra
Weight: 0.37
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, tiger
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00
be in danger of extinction 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leopard, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cheetah, be in danger)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(leopard, be in danger of extinction)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cheetah, be in danger)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leopard, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(leopard, be in danger of extinction)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(leopard, be in danger)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(leopard, be in danger of extinction)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(rhino, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(zebra, be in danger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tiger, be in danger of extinction)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leopard, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(leopard, be in danger of extinction)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tiger, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(tiger, be in danger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(zebra, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(zebra, be in danger)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(rhino, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rhino, be in danger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tiger, be in danger of extinction)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tiger, be in danger of extinction)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(cheetah, be in danger)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cheetah, be in danger of extinction)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(cheetah, be in danger of extinction)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cheetah, be in danger of extinction)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger of extinction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cheetah, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(leopard, be in danger)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(leopard, be in danger of extinction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rhino, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(zebra, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tiger, be in danger)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tiger, be in danger of extinction)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(leopard, be in danger)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cheetah, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(leopard, be in danger of extinction)