cheetah: is cat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.72
, wild animal
Weight: 0.70
, predator
Weight: 0.67
, mammal
Weight: 0.66
, leopard
Weight: 0.66
Siblings rhino
Weight: 0.38
, tortoise
Weight: 0.38
, zebra
Weight: 0.37
, tiger
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cat 1.00
is big cat 0.95
be called cats 0.90
be considered cats 0.86
be different from cats 0.86
be considered big cats 0.84
be called wild cats 0.84
be different from other cats 0.82
is animal 0.80
need dogs 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is cat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(zebra, is animal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(tiger, is animal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(tiger, is cat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tiger, is cat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(tiger, is animal)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tiger, is animal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(zebra, is animal)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(zebra, is animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(cheetah, is cat)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(cheetah, be called cats)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cheetah, be called cats)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be called cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, be considered big cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(cheetah, be considered big cats)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, is cat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cheetah, is cat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tiger, is cat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(zebra, is animal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cheetah, is cat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(tiger, is animal)