chef: be at kitchen

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at kitchen 1.00
be a part of kitchen 0.96
be do in kitchen 0.94
requires use kitchen 0.91
be used to warm up kitchen 0.87
be at store that sell kitchen 0.86
be used to kitchen table and chair 0.86
stock kitchen 0.84
be at downstairs 0.81
govern kitchen 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cook, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, be at kitchen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cook, be a part of kitchen)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, be at kitchen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cook, be do in kitchen)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, be at kitchen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cook, be at kitchen)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cook, be a part of kitchen)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cook, be do in kitchen)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cook, be a part of kitchen)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cook, be at kitchen)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cook, be do in kitchen)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be at downstairs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be used to kitchen table and chair)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, be at store that sell kitchen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cook, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(cook, be a part of kitchen)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(cook, be do in kitchen)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kitchen, be used to kitchen table and chair)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be used to kitchen table and chair)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kitchen, be at store that sell kitchen)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be at store that sell kitchen)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(kitchen, be at downstairs)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(kitchen, be at downstairs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chef, be at kitchen)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chef, govern kitchen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(chef, govern kitchen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(chef, govern kitchen)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(chef, govern kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, be at kitchen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cook, be at kitchen)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cook, be do in kitchen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cook, be a part of kitchen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(kitchen, be at store that sell kitchen)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(kitchen, be used to kitchen table and chair)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(kitchen, be at downstairs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cook, be at kitchen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cook, be do in kitchen)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(chef, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cook, be a part of kitchen)