chef: hate well done

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate well done 1.00
is good job 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chef, hate well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(chef, hate well done)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(chef, hate well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chef, is good job)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chef, hate well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chef, is good job)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(chef, hate well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chef, is good job)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chef, hate well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(chef, is good job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(chef, hate well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chef, hate well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(chef, hate well done)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(chef, hate well done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(chef, hate well done)