chef: use algebra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use algebra 1.00
use math 0.89
use maths in daily life 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(musician, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painter, use math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(painter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painter, use math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(musician, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(musician, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(chef, use algebra)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(chef, use math)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chef, use math)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(chef, use math)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(chef, use maths in daily life)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(chef, use math)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(chef, use maths in daily life)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chef, use maths in daily life)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chef, use maths in daily life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chef, use algebra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chef, use algebra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painter, use math)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(chef, use algebra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(musician, use math)