chef: use ratios

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use ratios 1.00
use rates 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chef, use ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(chef, use ratios)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(chef, use ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(chef, use rates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(chef, use ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(chef, use rates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chef, use ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(chef, use rates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(chef, use ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(chef, use rates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(chef, use ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chef, use ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chef, use ratios)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(chef, use ratios) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chef, use ratios)