chef: use science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.61
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, job
Weight: 0.59
, cook
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.34
, pianist
Weight: 0.34
, musician
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use science 1.00
use math 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(musician, use math)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(painter, use math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(painter, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(painter, use math)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(musician, use math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(musician, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(chef, use science)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(chef, use math)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(chef, use math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(chef, use math)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(chef, use math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, use science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(chef, use science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(painter, use math)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chef, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(musician, use math)