chemical reaction: be in living systems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.63
, cause
Weight: 0.63
, reaction
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.65
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.64
, enzyme
Weight: 0.63
, combustion
Weight: 0.62
, hydrogen
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in living systems 1.00
be important in living things 0.81
be important to living organisms 0.78
be essential to living creatures 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(reaction, be important in living things)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(reaction, be important to living organisms)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(reaction, be essential to living creatures)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(reaction, be essential to living creatures)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(reaction, be important to living organisms)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(reaction, be important in living things)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(reaction, be important in living things)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(reaction, be essential to living creatures)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(reaction, be important to living organisms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, be important to living organisms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(reaction, be important in living things)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(reaction, be important to living organisms)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(reaction, be essential to living creatures)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hydrolysis, be important to living organisms)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, be important to living organisms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(chemical reaction, be in living systems)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be essential to living creatures)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(chemical reaction, be essential to living creatures)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, be essential to living creatures)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, be essential to living creatures)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be important in living things)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be important to living organisms)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, be important in living things)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(chemical reaction, be important in living things)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, be important in living things)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, be important to living organisms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(chemical reaction, be important to living organisms)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, be important to living organisms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reaction, be important in living things)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(reaction, be important to living organisms)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(reaction, be essential to living creatures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, be important to living organisms)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(reaction, be essential to living creatures)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reaction, be important in living things)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(chemical reaction, be in living systems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(reaction, be important to living organisms)