chemical reaction: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.63
, cause
Weight: 0.63
, reaction
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hydrolysis
Weight: 0.65
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.64
, enzyme
Weight: 0.63
, combustion
Weight: 0.62
, hydrogen
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(hydrogen, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(hydrogen, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hydrogen, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(chemical reaction, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(chemical reaction, has quality questions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality questions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, has quality questions)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chemical reaction, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chemical reaction, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hydrogen, has quality good)